Below are some of the results from the second test with the evpmaker program first mentioned in this post. In an effort to try and reduce the tinniness Lady Wolfen Mists and Shawn mentioned in this post, I created a new audio file to use as background noise: I lowered and softened my voice to just above a whisper.  Please let me know if this helps reduce that "tin-can" effect from the first test, and if it brings out what seem to be EVPs more clearly.

In this second test, I have reduced the noise and slightly amplified these possible EVPs. The noise reduction is done to remove as much background noise as possible, and the slight amplification is done to facilitate clarity for listeners.


EVP #1:  "she must be strong...": 

EVP #2:  "can you see me": 

EVP #3:  "knock knock, I'm back": 

EVP #4:  "I lost my reason": 

EVP #5:  "bless you": 


One thing I have noticed so far about the program is that there seems to be a lot of unexplained "chatter" during the test sessions. I'm not sure if this is actual EVP that's occurring, or just the way the bits of sound come through the speakers. To me, it sounds like several males talking among themselves or talking about what I'm doing, with an occasional female's voice coming through, but unless or until the entities in our house figure out how to speak up and speak more clearly, it's hard to be certain. This is why I've reduced the noise in the audio clips and slightly amplified what seemed to be EVPs.

At this point, although communication can't occur in real time, the digital voice recorder still seems to be the better tool to use. However, this is only the second test.  Also, it is my opinion that the entities in our house also need time to adjust to this method, which is why testing will continue.

Please share your thoughts, suggestions, questions, and comments on this test. Feedback is very important and it will help me determine whether or not this new software is a viable and reliable means of communication.